Ke Wenzhe talks about ****

China Taiwan Net News, April 1 Taipei mayor Ke Wenzhe recently accepted media interviews with Taiwan’s Central Review Agency and proposed that no one in the world today believes that there is a “****”, so “one China” is not a problem. In response to this issue, the Central Rating Agency published an editorial today, pointing out that Ke Wenzhe has shown good intentions to the mainland and has made great efforts to personally visit the Shanghai Taipei Forum. On the other hand, even Taiwan’s decision to join the AIIB does not dare to speak out for support or opposition.

The article mentioned that on March 31, the Taiwan media had two major concerns. One was Ko Wenzhe’s talk about “one China” and the other was Ma Ying-jeou’s decision to submit a letter of intent for the AIIB to the mainland. These two topics have succeeded in bringing attention to the policies of Ke and Taiwan authorities. On the contrary, their attitudes are not clear. If *** wants to win the 2016 “election” victory, how will the cross-Strait policy be adjusted? Under these pressures can no longer be dragged.

The analysis of the article pointed out that Ke Wenzhe’s speech on the cross-strait shows flexibility, and the pressure will indirectly affect him. ***We believe that the 2016 “General Election” has a good chance of success, and so far no clear cross-strait policy has been proposed. After Ko’s comments on “Four Mutual” and “One China is not a problem”, Tsai Ing-wen, who is a petition candidate, can No cross-strait discussion?

The article said that Ma Ying-jeou’s authorities proposed a letter of intent to become a founding member of the AIIB after March 30th “national security high-level meeting”. The sniper Ma authorities should first assess whether they want to participate, but *** participated in the AIIB. What is the clear attitude? Tsai Ing-wen's writing on Facebook was only a question and approval, and he did not dare to clearly state his position. ***I always advocated that Taiwan should participate more in international organizations. The problems identified by Tsai Ing-wen did indeed require extensive discussion, but just as Secretary General Ke Jianming said, support for joining the AIIB is just a matter of transfer method and name. Need to be solved again. However, Cai Yinglian and Ke Jianming's position of support or non-support is ambiguous. When the election is closer to the 2016 “election,” voters will still want to make it clear.

At the end of the article, after Ko Wenzhe and Ma Ying-jeou’s successive moves, although it may seem difficult to have a certain conclusion in a short time, the effect will be very great. The first thing to bear is the need for cross-strait policy to be expressed. Tsai Ing-wen wants to continue to adopt a fuzzy approach. After cross-strait policies, I am afraid we can no longer confess to voters.